Browse articles
ERRATUM
J Carcinog2020,  19:10

Erratum: Development of clinico-histopathological predictive model for the assessment of metastatic risk of oral squamous cell carcinoma


Date of Submission02-Aug-2020
Date of Acceptance30-Aug-2020
Date of Web Publication08-Oct-2020

Correspondence Address:
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/1477-3163.297515


How to cite this article:
.. Erratum: Development of clinico-histopathological predictive model for the assessment of metastatic risk of oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Carcinog 2020;19:10

How to cite this URL:
.. Erratum: Development of clinico-histopathological predictive model for the assessment of metastatic risk of oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Carcinog [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Dec 1];19:10. Available from: http://www.carcinogenesis.com/text.asp?2020/19/1/10/297515



In the article titled “Development of clinico-histopathological predictive model for the assessment of metastatic risk of oral squamous cell carcinoma”, published in article number 2, issue 1, Volume 19 of Journal of Carcinogenesis,[1] there are minor errors on page no. 2, paragraph number 4, under methods section. It is currently published as “Single cells or tiny groups of about five or more cells scattered at the ITF were considered as tumor buds. They were graded as low and high based on <5 buds and ≥5 buds, respectively at ×20.[8] Cytoplasmic pseudofragments were identified as non-nucleated, smoothly contoured fragments that were uniformly positively stained for cytokeratin. Based on the number of fragments/field in ×20, they were categorized into low (0–9 fragments) and high grades (≥10 fragments).[9]

The correct paragraph should be read as “Single cells or tiny groups of about five or more cells scattered at the ITF were considered as tumor buds. They were graded as low and high based on <10 buds and ≥10 buds, respectively at ×200.[8] Cytoplasmic pseudofragments were identified as non-nucleated, smoothly contoured fragments that were uniformly positively stained for cytokeratin. Based on the number of fragments/field in ×200, they were categorized into low (0–9 fragments) and high grades (≥10 fragments).[9]



 
  References Top

1.
Sowmya S V, Rao RS, Prasad K. Development of clinico-histopathological predictive model for the assessment of metastatic risk of oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Carcinog 2020;19:2.  Back to cited text no. 1
  [Full text]  




 

Top
Previous article  Next article
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed432    
    Printed54    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded0    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal