Browse articles
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
J Carcinog2021,  20:5

Melatonin effect on hypoxia inducible factor-1a and clinical response in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A randomized controlled trial


1 Oncology Division, Department of Surgery, Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
2 Department of Urology, Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
3 Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
4 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
5 Department of Histology and Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health, and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
6 Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
7 Department of Pathological Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia

Date of Submission15-Aug-2020
Date of Decision21-Dec-2020
Date of Acceptance06-Jan-2021
Date of Web Publication07-May-2021

Correspondence Address:
Diani Kartini
Department of Surgery, Division of Oncology, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jl. Pangeran Diponegoro No. 71, Rw. 5, Kenari, Kec. Senen, Kota Jakarta Pusat, Daerah Khusus Ibukota, Jakarta 10430
Indonesia
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jcar.JCar_19_20

  Abstract 


Context: Chemoresistance is a major issue in patients with locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of melatonin in conjunction with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC) on hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) expression and clinical response in locally advanced OSCC patients.
Aims: To study the effects of melatonin on HIF-1α expression and its effect on the clinical response of patients with locally advanced OSCC.
Settings and Design: A randomized controlled trial was conducted, wherein patients were recruited from several hospitals in Jakarta, Indonesia. Patients were randomized into two groups using computerized block randomization.
Subjects and Methods: Both groups were given NC, with treatment group receiving melatonin. Outcomes measured in this study were HIF-1α expression from tissue samples and clinical response based on the RECIST 1.1 criteria. Twenty-five patients completed the study protocol and were included in the data analysis.
Statistical Analysis Used: Shapiro–Wilk test was used to test the data normality. For data with normal distribution, we conducted an independent t-test to compare between the two groups. Data with abnormal distribution were analyzed using Mann–Whitney U-test. The mean difference between the two groups was analyzed using Shapiro–Wilk normality test.
Results: Our study showed a significant decrease in HIF-1α expression in the melatonin group compared to the placebo group (P < 0.05, relative risk 3.08). However, the degree of reduction of HIF-1α expression in the melatonin group did not differ significantly (P = 0.301).
Conclusions: Our study showed that melatonin administered at 20 mg/day could reduce the expression of HIF-1α and residual tumor percentage, but did not affect the clinical response in OSCC patients.

Keywords: Chemoresistance, hypoxia-inducible factor-1α, melatonin, oral squamous cell carcinoma


How to cite this article:
Kartini D, Taher A, Panigoro SS, Setiabudy R, Jusman SW, Haryana SM, Murdani A, Rustamadji P, Karisyah A, Rasyid SH. Melatonin effect on hypoxia inducible factor-1a and clinical response in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A randomized controlled trial. J Carcinog 2021;20:5

How to cite this URL:
Kartini D, Taher A, Panigoro SS, Setiabudy R, Jusman SW, Haryana SM, Murdani A, Rustamadji P, Karisyah A, Rasyid SH. Melatonin effect on hypoxia inducible factor-1a and clinical response in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A randomized controlled trial. J Carcinog [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Sep 17];20:5. Available from: http://www.carcinogenesis.com/text.asp?2021/20/1/5/315668




  Introduction Top


Head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (HN-SCC) is currently the sixth most common cancer in the world.[1] Recent data have shown that there are 500,000 cases of HN-SCC with 40,000 new cases each year in the United States alone.[2] In Japan, cases of oral SCC (OSCC), which is a part of HN-SCC, have increased from 2100 cases in 1975 to 6900 cases in 2000.[3]

Management of HN-SCC, especially OSCC, presents specific challenges due to the requirement of protecting important anatomical structures that are prone to be damaged by tumor infiltration and cancer therapy.[4],[5]

Platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC) has been proven to cause tumor shrinkage and to improve tumor resectability.[6] A retrospective study by Patil et al. in 2013 showed that 68% of the patients with locally advanced oral cavity cancer who received three NC regimens of NC (platinum + 5-FU [PF] + docetaxel)/TPF achieved significant resectability, compared to 37% in the group treated with two regimens (platinum + taxane) (P = 0.029).[7] The use of the TPF regimen as NC has been also supported by a meta-analysis by Blanchard et al. in 2013, which showed that the TPF regimen was not only better in increasing local control but also in increasing overall survival compared to using PF.[8]

In addition to the chemotherapy regimen, age, tumor location, and stage, chemoresistance is also an issue in locally advanced OSCC. Chemoresistance is a complex process with three possible causes: drug-target interaction, intrinsic tumor cell defense, and conditions affecting tumor cell survival.[9] Hypoxic stress is a microenvironment condition that causes chemoresistance. In hypoxic tissues, a poor vascular system causes an inefficient drug delivery that further causes decrement of drug concentration in the target tissue.[10]

Hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF), especially HIF-1α, is a transcription factor that plays an important role in cancer development during hypoxic conditions and whose activity is highly influenced by oxygen. Under normoxic conditions, HIF-1α is degraded by the enzyme prolyl hydroxylase. In contrast, if hypoxia occurs, HIF-1α will be dimerized with HIF-1 β to form HIF-1. HIF-1 will then activate several genes, some of which encode the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and a few other enzymes that metabolize glucose, iron, and nucleosides.[11] Therefore, increased HIF-1α activity will affect angiogenesis, maintenance of cancer stem cells (CSCs), tumor invasion, metastasis, and resistance to radiotherapy and chemotherapy.[12] The connection between HIF-1α and hypoxia has prompted this study, which investigated whether melatonin supplementation, considered a potent antioxidant, was able to decrease gene expression of HIF-1α.

Melatonin (5-methoxy-N-acetyltryptamine) is naturally produced and secreted by the pineal gland. This hormone is different from other hormones due to its ability to influence the activity of almost every cell type without having a specific target organ.[13],[14] Its mechanism of action begins with the activation of its receptor proteins, namely MT1 and MT2. In general, activation of these two receptors will stimulate the nervous system, causes vasoconstriction of arteries, inhibition of cancer cell proliferation, stimulation of the immune system, as well as assistance in metabolic and reproductive functions. One of the effects of melatonin is the inhibition of cancer cell proliferation through the MT1 receptor. Therefore, melatonin possesses an oncostatic property.[15]

In a previous study, the administration of melatonin resulted in reduced proliferation, state of stemness, and invasiveness in human ovarian CSCs.[16] Melatonin also demonstrated its anti-metastatic property by halting cancer cell migration and invasion of triple-negative breast cancer cell, which is an aggressive subtype of breast cancer that is associated with high metastatic rates and poorer prognosis.[17] Besides its anti-metastatic effect, an in vitro study by Cheng et al., showed that melatonin also served as an anti-angiogenic agent through the downregulation of the hypoxia/HIF-1α/ROS/VEGF pathway.[18] In addition, melatonin administration was shown to significantly reduce tumor volume by almost 70%.[19]

Considering the effectiveness of melatonin in cancer, it has been deemed worthwhile to evaluate the effects of melatonin on advanced-stage cancer where chemotherapy is the treatment of choice and chemoresistance is a challenge. Previous studies related to melatonin supplementation mostly involved patients with solid cancer.[20],[21],[22],[23],[24] Therefore, this study formulated a well design method with a specific population to obtain a solid result as a pilot study. Furthermore, we tried to evaluate the effect of melatonin in hypoxic condition not only in the clinical level but also in the molecular level to assess causality. With these considerations, we decided to evaluate melatonin's effects in the reduction of tissue HIF-1α expression and improvement of the clinical response to chemotherapy.


  Subjects and Methods Top


Study design

We conducted a double-blind, parallel randomized, and placebo-controlled trial. The trial was registered as a clinical trial study in www.clinicaltrial.gov on October 24, 2019, under registration identification number NCT04137627. This study was reported in accordance with the CONSORT guidelines for clinical trials.

Subjects

The study was performed from June 2017 to July 2018 in the Surgical Oncology Clinic of CMN General Hospital, PSH General Hospital, and DCA Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia. Subjects of this study were patients with stage IVA and IVB OSCC diagnosed by using histopathological examination and with no history of definitive surgery or chemotherapy. To be eligible for inclusion in this study, patients must have been scheduled to receive NC and a Karnofsky score of s805;50. The exclusion criteria of this study are those patients who did not meet the criteria for receiving chemotherapy (including poor general conditions and treatment refusal) and any metastasis. Informed consent was obtained from each patient included in this study. At the beginning of the study, 62 subjects were assessed for eligibility. A total of twelve patients were excluded due to poor general conditions,[7] treatment refusals,[3] and metastasis.[2] The remaining 50 patients were randomized into intervention and control groups. Hence, each group contained of 25 patients. In the intervention group, 13 patients were lost to follow-up, whereas 12 were lost to follow-up from the control group. Ultimately, 25 patients completed the study protocol and were included in the data analysis. The recruitment flow of study participants is shown in [Figure 1] of the referenced study.[25]
Figure 1: The recruitment flow diagram of subjects

Click here to view


Intervention

The intervention group received capsules containing 20 mg of melatonin + NC, while the control group received capsules containing placebo + NC.[26] The NC regimen that was administered consisted of docetaxel of 75 mg/m2 + cisplatin 80–100 mg/m2 or carboplatin + 5-FU 1000 mg/m2. Docetaxel was given on the 1st day of the chemotherapy session with cisplatin/carboplatin, whereas 5-FU was also given on the 1st day and continued until the fifth day. We administered a dose of 80 mg/m2 of cisplatin if the subject had a Karnofsky score of 50–70 and 100 mg/m2 for Karnofsky scores above 70. Chemotherapy was administered every 3 weeks. We performed blood tests soon after every session of chemotherapy and 3–7 days before the next cycle to assess the patient's eligibility for chemotherapy. If the results from the blood tests did not meet the criteria for chemotherapy, the patient was admitted to improve clinical conditions. Melatonin or placebo capsules were consumed at night, 7 days before NC initiation, until the third cycle of chemotherapy was completed. Melatonin or placebo was administered even if the patient was admitted for improvement in the clinical conditions. A research assistant assessed the patient's compliance by contacting the patient twice per week.

Outcomes

The three outcomes evaluated in this study were HIF-1α expression, clinical response, and residual tumor percentage. All outcomes were compared before and after the treatment. For tissue examination, we performed incisional biopsy for pretreatment and either incisional biopsy or surgery for posttreatment. HIF-1α expression was measured in tissue samples in the form of messenger RNA (mRNA) concentration. First, we made a primer for HIF-1α using the Primer Quest Tool IDT (Integrated DNA Technologies in Singapore) with genetic sequence information provided by the National Centre for Biotechnology Information (HIF-1α with accession number NM_001530.3). Then, we measured HIF-1α gene expression using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction absolute quantification based on the standard curve of the template (gene fragment) amplification result with known various concentrations. Gene fragment was obtained by designing gBlocks gene fragments (from IDT in Coralville, Iowa, USA) with various concentrations, starting from 100 ng/mL, which contains the gene fragment sequence of HIF-1α (sized <150 bp). The selection of sequence and gBlock synthesis was performed using the gBlocks Gene Fragments IDT. Clinical response outcomes from chemotherapy were evaluated using the RECIST 1.1 criteria. These outcomes, namely complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD), were categorized into positive (CR and PR) and negative (SD and PD) responses for the purpose of our analysis. We assessed the response and residual tumor percentage by comparing tumor diameter and lymph node involvement from magnetic resonance imaging results obtained before and after treatment. Besides, the adverse events of melatonin administration were recorded in this study.

Sample size

We calculated sample size using the formula for two independent variables with the continuous outcome for superiority trial design. With this formula, we required a minimum of 42 subjects to fulfil the objectives of this study, assuming a 5% level of significance and 80% power. Assuming a 10% dropout rate, a total of 46 patients denoted the minimum sample size required for this study. Consecutive sampling with randomization was used for the sampling method.

Randomization and blinding

Research subject allocation was randomized by a third party using computerized block randomization with concealment by ascribing serial numbers to drug preparations. The authors, who also acted as care providers and outcome assessors, as well as the subjects, were blinded.

Statistical method

Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp. We used the Shapiro–Wilk test to test data normality. Data with normal distribution is presented in the form of mean ± standard deviation, while data with abnormal distribution is presented as median, minimum, and maximum values. For data with normal distribution, we used an independent t-test to compare between two groups. Data with abnormal distribution were analyzed using the Mann–Whitney U test. The mean difference between the two groups was analyzed using the Shapiro–Wilk normality test. A P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Ethics

The authors declare that all procedures in this study have been approved by The Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, UNI under registration number 1071/UN2.F1/ETIK/2018. Informed consents from patients to participate in the study have been obtained in written forms.


  Results Top


Baseline characteristics of study subjects

From the 50 patients enrolled at the beginning of the study, only 25 patients successfully completed the study protocol. This was due to: (i) Decrement of Karnofsky scores (n = 4), refusal of patients to continue the chemotherapy session or biopsy (n = 6), events of metastasis (n = 3), and deaths of the patients (n = 12). Characteristics of the 25 patients who completed the study are described in [Table 1].
Table 1: Characteristics of patients who completed the study protocols for melatonin-receiving group and placebo-receiving group

Click here to view


Effect of melatonin on hypoxia-inducible factor-1α expression

Melatonin administration decreased gene expression of HIF-1α in 10 out of 13 patients in the intervention group compared to 3 out of 12 in the control group. This finding was statistically significant (P = 0.009; relative risk = 3.08) [Figure 2]. However, there was no significant difference in the degree of reduction or delta reduction of HIF-1α gene expressions between the two groups before and after the administration of melatonin and placebo [Table 2].
Figure 2: Percentage of subjects that showed change in hypoxia inducible factor-1a expression in melatonin-receiving group (13 subjects) and placebo-receiving group (12 subjects)

Click here to view
Table 2: Expression of hypoxia inducible factor -1a before and after melatonin and placebo administration

Click here to view


Relationship between hypoxia-inducible factor-1α gene expression and residual tumor percentage

[Table 3] shows the decrements of HIF-1α gene expressions found in the intervention group; the decrement was not directly proportional to the reduction of residual tumor percentage after NC. As shown in [Table 3], the majority of patients receiving melatonin showed HIF-1α decrement (in 10 out of 13 patients).
Table 3: Effect of melatonin on hypoxia-inducible factor -1a gene expression and residual tumor percentage

Click here to view


Effect of melatonin on clinical response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy

The results from our analysis that evaluated the effect of melatonin on the positive clinical response after receiving NC showed that there was no significant difference between the two groups [Table 4]. However, the evaluated residual tumor percentage was 21.4% lower in the melatonin-receiving group compared to that in the placebo-receiving group [Figure 3].
Figure 3: Comparison of clinical response based on the residual tumor percentage

Click here to view
Table 4: Comparison of chemotherapy response in melatonin-receiving group and placebo-receiving group

Click here to view


Adverse events of melatonin

Adverse events observed in this study included sleep disorders, fatigue, headache, etc. [Table 5]. The most common adverse event is drowsiness in 4 out of 13 patients. Patients with adverse events were administered with symptomatic therapy without any effects on chemotherapy administration.
Table 5: Adverse events in melatonin-receiving group and placebo-receiving group

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


Although there was no significant difference in the general baseline characteristics between the two groups, none could influence the results of the study. Clavel et al. described pathological parameters, including tumor differentiation, as prognostic factors of chemotherapeutic response. Their study showed that chemotherapeutic response and 2-year survival were better in nonkeratinizing tumors. It was also shown that in rapidly proliferating tumors, recurrence occurred in 76% of the cases compared to slow-proliferating tumors where only 36.4% recurred.[27] In the present study, we found no significant relationship between SCC grading and chemotherapeutic response.

Our results show that melatonin administration reduces HIF-1α gene expression compared to that in the control group. This finding is in line with the findings of the study conducted by Goncalves et al. on cell lines in 2014. The study evaluated the effect of melatonin administration on two different cell lines that originated from SCC of the tongue in patients aged 25 years old (SCC9) and 75 years old (SCC 25). The study showed that in SCC9, administration of 1 mM melatonin in hypoxic tissues decreased HIF-1α gene expression compared to that in the control group (P < 0.001).[28] Moreover, other studies conducted in prostate cancer, colon cancer, and glioblastoma at the cellular levels showed similar results.[29],[30],[31]

The current study revealed that the decrement degree in HIF-1α gene expression was not significantly different between the two groups and the decrease in HIF-1α expression was not directly proportional to the decrease in residual tumor percentage after chemotherapy. This might have been caused by the presence of confounding factors due to the in vivo nature of this study. Other studies were conducted in vitro, where the heterogeneity of the cell culture could be tightly controlled. However, in vitro studies also have limitations where the translation to a clinical phenotype is often difficult.[32] Moreover, a study by Park in 2009, which evaluated the melatonin effect on several different phases of HIF-1α formation, showed a significant decrease in HIF-1α expression at the protein level. However, HIF-1α expression did not change at the mRNA level. This may indicate that melatonin affects HIF-1α gene expression in posttranslational regulation.[33] In the present study, HIF-1α expression was only evaluated at the mRNA level, therefore further studies are necessary to validate the action of melatonin in reducing HIF-1α expression, especially at the protein levels.

Unlike previously published studies on various types of solid cancer, the results from our study showed no significant difference in chemotherapeutic response. A systematic review by Seely et al. evaluating the melatonin effect on the chemotherapeutic response found positive results whereby melatonin administration could increase CR and PR up to 2.33 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.29–4.20) and 1.90 (95% CI = 1.43–2.51), respectively.[34] Similar results were also found in a systematic review reported by Block et al. in 2007. Block also reported limitations in the studies, such as the difference in the proportion of the patients with PD in the two trial groups which could affect the results.[35] Moreover, the review included studies of various types of solid cancer and several included papers were published by the same group, hence could lead to biased conclusions.[34],[35]

The differences seen in the results of our study compared to the two aforementioned systematic reviews could be due to the heterogeneity of the tumors. Tumor heterogeneity is caused by different molecular properties of the various cell types that constitute a tumor, which may lead to varying sensitivity to treatment. This heterogeneity could be caused by the variability in cell properties in one or various locations of the tumor (spatial heterogeneity) or time (temporal heterogeneity) where the molecular makeup of a single lesion may vary over time. Results from these evaluations would shift the paradigm of cancer therapy to one that could become more personalized and genotype-guided.[36]

Despite the results showing no significant difference in the chemotherapeutic response between the two groups, our study revealed that the percentage of residual tumor reduction after chemotherapy was 21.4% greater in the melatonin-receiving group compared to that in the control. This finding may assist clinicians in progressing to the next therapeutic phase, where clinicians might consider to add melatonin as a supplementation therapy to obtain their effects such as the reduction in residual tumor percentage. Hence, it is hoped that operating field of the tumor becomes easier to handle.

There were adverse events of melatonin administration shown in [Table 5], where drowsiness is the most common adverse event (4/13). Melatonin is able to decrease the pain threshold, being an antidepressant, anxiolytic, and regulate locomotor activity.[37] Furthermore, the dosage used in this study, 20 mg/day, was in line with a previous study stating that there was not any significant toxicity effect.[38]

Nevertheless, some of the limitations of this study must be stated. Owing to intratumoral heterogeneity, incisional biopsy is unlikely to provide an accurate result that represents the entire lesion. This constitutes a limitation of this study. In this study, we minimized bias by documenting pretreatment biopsy location as a guide for posttreatment biopsy location so that the pre- and post-treatment tissue examined were from similar locations. In addition, we acknowledge that only half of the recruited samples were used in the analysis. This high dropout rate might lead to a significantly smaller sample size and results in a lower statistical power.


  Conclusion Top


Melatonin administration of 20 mg/day can lower HIF-1α expression (P < 0.05, RR 3.08). However, there was no significant difference in the degree of reduction of HIF-1α gene expression between the two groups. Patients who received melatonins showed residual tumor reductions 21.4% greater than that of the placebo-receiving group. This should be taken into consideration by clinicians when deciding on supplemental therapeutic options for their patients.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Warnakulasuriya S. Global epidemiology of oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Oral Oncol 2009;45:309-16.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Marur S, Forastiere AA. Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Update on epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Mayo Clin Proc 2016;91:386-96.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Yamamoto N, Shibahara T. Epidemiology of the Oral Cancer in Oral Cancer: Diagnosis and Therapy. Japan: Springer; 2015.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Ko C, Citrin D. Radiotherapy for the management of locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Oral Dis 2009;15:121-32.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Shah J, Patel S, Singh B, Wong R. Head and Neck: Surgery and Oncology. Edinburgh: Elsevier; 2003.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Kim R, Hahn S, Shin J, Ock CY, Kim M, Keam B, et al. The effect of induction chemotherapy using docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil on survival in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A meta-analysis. Cancer Res Treat 2016;48:907-16.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Patil VM, Noronha V, Muddu VK, Gulia S, Bhosale B, Arya S, et al. Induction chemotherapy in technically unresectable locally advanced oral cavity cancers: Does it make a difference? Indian J Cancer 2013;50:1000-4.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Blanchard P, Bourhis J, Lacas B, Posner MR, Vermorker JB, Hernandez JJ, et al. Taxane-cisplatin-fluorouracil as induction chemotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancers: An individual patient data meta-analysis of the meta-analysis of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer group J Clin Oncol 2013;31:2854-60.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Gatti L, Zunino F. Overview of tumor cell chemoresistance mechanisms. Methods Mol Med 2005;111:127-48.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Li JZ, Gao W, Chan JY, Ho WK, Wong TS. Hypoxia in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. ISRN Otolaryngol 2012;2012:1-8.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Brennan PA, Mackenzie N, Quintero M. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha in oral cancer. J Oral Pathol Med 2005;34:385-9.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Semenza GL. Hypoxia-inducible factors: Mediators of cancer progression and targets for cancer therapy. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2012;33:207-14.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Srinivasan V, Pandi-Perumal SR, Brzezinski A, Bhatnagar KP, Cardinali DP. Melatonin, immune function and cancer. Recent Pat Endocr Metab Immune Drug Discov 2011;5:109-23.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Tan DX, Manchester LC, Hardeland R, Lopez-Burillo S, Mayo JC, Sainz RM, et al. Melatonin: a hormone, a tissue factor, an autocoid, a paracoid, and an antioxidant vitamin. J Pineal Res 2003;34:75-8.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Dubocovich ML, Markowska M. Functional MT1 and MT2 melatonin receptors in mammals. Endocrine 2005;27:101-10.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Akbarzadeh M, Movassaghpour AA, Ghanbari H, Kheirandish M, Fathi Maroufi N, Rahbarghazi R, et al. The potential therapeutic effect of melatonin on human ovarian cancer by inhibition of invasion and migration of cancer stem cells. Sci Rep 2017;7:17062.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Kim TH, Cho SG. Melatonin-induced KiSS1 expression inhibits triple-negative breast cancer cell invasiveness. Oncol Lett 2017;14:2511-6.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Cheng J, Yang HL, Gu CJ, Liu YK, Shao J, Zhu R, et al. Melatonin restricts the viability and angiogenesis of vascular endothelial cells by suppressing HIF-1α/ROS/VEGF. Int J Mol Med 2019;43:945-55.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Kubatka P, Bojková B, M ciková-Kalická K, Mníchová-Chamilová M, Adámeková E, Ahlers I, et al. Effects of tamoxifen and melatonin on mammary gland cancer induced by N-methyl-N-nitrosourea and by 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene, respectively, in female Sprague-Dawley rats. Folia Biol (Praha) 2001;47:5-10.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Lissoni P. Biochemotherapy with standard chemotherapies plus the pineal hormone melatonin in the treatment of advanced solid neoplasms. Pathol Biol (Paris) 2007;55:201-4.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Lissoni P, Chilelli M, Villa S, Cerizza L, Tancini G. Five years survival in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy and melatonin: A randomized trial. J Pineal Res 2003;35:12-5.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Lissoni P, Paolorossi F, Ardizzoia A, Barni S, Chilelli M, Mancuso M, et al. A randomized study of chemotherapy with cisplatin plus etoposide versus chemoendocrine therapy with cisplatin, etoposide and the pineal hormone melatonin as a first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients in a poor clinical state. J Pineal Res 1997;23:15-9.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Lissoni P, Tancini G, Barni S, Paolorossi F, Ardizzoia A, Conti A, et al. Treatment of cancer chemotherapy-induced toxicity with the pineal hormone melatonin. Support Care Cancer 1997;5:126-9.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Greenlee H, Hershman DL, Jacobson JS. Use of antioxidant supplements during breast cancer treatment: a comprehensive review. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2009;115:437-52.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Kartini D, Taher A, Panigoro SS, Setiabudy R, Jusman SW, Haryana SM, et al. Effect of melatonin supplementation in combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy to miR-210 and cd t44 expression and clinical response improvement in locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma: A randomized controlled trial. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst 2020;32:1-7.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Lissoni P, Rovelli F, Malugani F, Bucovec R, Conti A, Maestroni GJ. Anti-angiogenic activity of melatonin in advanced cancer patients. Neuro Endocrinol Lett 2001;22:45-7.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Clavel M, Mansour AR. Head and neck cancer: Prognostic factors for response to chemotherapy. Eur J Cancer 1991;27:349-56.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Gonçalves Ndo N, Rodrigues RV, Jardim-Perassi BV, Moschetta MG, Lopes JR, Colombo J, et al. Molecular markers of angiogenesis and metastasis in lines of oral carcinoma after treatment with melatonin. Anticancer Agents Med Chem 2014;14:1302-11.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Zhang Y, Liu Q, Wang F, Ling EA, Liu S, Wang L, et al. Melatonin antagonizes hypoxia-mediated glioblastoma cell migration and invasion via inhibition of HIF-1α. J Pineal Res 2013;55:121-30.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Park SY, Jang WJ, Yi EY, Jang JY, Jung Y, Jeong JW, et al. Melatonin suppresses tumor angiogenesis by inhibiting HIF-1α stabilization under hypoxia. J Pineal Res 2010;48:178-84.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Sohn EJ, Won G, Lee J, Lee S, Kim SH. Upregulation of miRNA3195 and miRNA374b mediates the anti-angiogenic properties of melatonin in hypoxic PC-3 prostate cancer cells. J Cancer 2015;6:19-28.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Welsh M, Mangravite L, Medina MW, Tantisira K, Zhang W, Huang RS, et al. Pharmacogenomic discovery using cell-based models. Pharmacol Rev 2009;61:413-29.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Park JW, Hwang MS, Suh SI, Baek WK. Melatonin down-regulates HIF-1α expression through inhibition of protein translation in prostate cancer cells. J Pineal Res 2009;46:415-21.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Seely D, Wu P, Fritz H, Kennedy DA, Tsui T, Seely AJ, et al. Melatonin as adjuvant cancer care with and without chemotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Integr Cancer Ther 2012;11:293-303.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Block KI, Koch AC, Mead MN, Tothy PK, Newman RA, Gyllenhaal C. Impact of antioxidant supplementation on chemotherapeutic efficacy: A systematic review of the evidence from randomized controlled trials. Int J Cancer 2008;123:1227-39.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Dagogo-Jack I, Shaw AT. Tumour heterogeneity and resistance to cancer therapies. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2017;15:81-94.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Emet M, Ozcan H, Ozel L, Yayla M, Halici Z, Hacimuftuoglu A. A review of melatonin, its receptors and drugs. Eurasian J Med 2016;48:135-41.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Güneri P, Epstein JB. Late stage diagnosis of oral cancer: Components and possible solutions. Oral Oncol 2014;50:1131-6.  Back to cited text no. 38
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5]



 

Top
Previous article  Next article
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2856    
    Printed156    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded0    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal